BRE’s latest analysis quantifies the cost to the NHS of poor quality homes in England, highlighting that while over 700K English homes are excessively cold, the NHS spends over £540M pa treating people affected by the worst properties, so investing in repairs and upgrades would pay back within 9 years.
image: for illustration – Open Government Licence v3.0
…2.4mn homes in England….identified as having a Category 1 hazard…
BRE writes:
Today, BRE publishes The Cost of Poor Housing by tenure in England, which follows its 2021 analysis on the overall cost of substandard housing to the NHS. For the first time, BRE’s research provides a breakdown of the impact of poor housing (1) on the NHS in each of the owner occupied, privately rented, and socially rented sectors.
Of the 2.4mn homes in England which BRE identified as having a Category 1 hazard (2), there are 700,000 homes that are officially assessed as excessively cold.
This means that millions of people across the country could be at risk of ill health as a result of poorly insulated and inadequately heated properties. Excess cold is most prevalent among properties that are owner occupied or privately rented – homes which are more likely to have the lowest energy efficiency ratings (a band F or G). Over half a million owner occupied properties and 200,000 privately rented homes fall into this category.
Because of the long-running Decent Homes Standard regulations in the social housing sector, a comparatively small number – just over 20,000 – socially rented homes are excessively cold. Those living in owner occupied properties are most at risk of ill health caused by excess cold given their age, an average of 58 (3), and health status.
The NHS bill to treat people impacted by excess cold of £540mn per year could be mitigated if action was taken to improve the efficiency and quality of England’s housing stock, with a pay back of between 8 and 9 years.
Gillian Charlesworth, CEO, BRE, commented: “Today’s analysis reminds us just how much of an impact poorly insulated and inadequately heated homes are having on residents and our public services, particularly in the poorest quality properties. Poorly insulated homes have an immediate impact on the health of the people who live in them, as well as being expensive to heat and a barrier to meeting our net zero ambitions. When local and national government know where the most problematic homes are from data like these, they can design targeted programmes to improve them.
“But these results are the tip of the iceberg. These are only the direct costs to the NHS of treating health problems from the very least energy efficient homes. With the current energy price crisis, families living in a much wider group of homes will be struggling to heat their homes this winter and so even more people are likely to face health problems as a result. This leaves them unable to work, and potentially having to remain in hospital for a long time if their home isn’t safe to return to, meaning that the impact on the wider economy is even greater.”
“Strategic retrofit programmes are critical to improving the energy efficiency and safety of a property. We need to see a continued and targeted effort to improve England’s poorest homes, for the benefit of individuals, society and our public infrastructure” – Gillian Charlesworth CEO of BRE.
BRE’s research shows that if immediate steps were taken to mitigate the impact of excess cold across England’s poorest quality homes – through cost-effective solutions like insulation and heating system improvements – it would cost £5.3bn.
When broken down by tenure, BRE estimates that it would cost, on average, £6,690 to remedy excess cold for an owner-occupied property and £6,835 per property in the private rented sector.
A government policy – Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards – is in place to require landlords to improve excessively cold private rented properties. However, landlords only need to spend a maximum of £3,500 including VAT to improve their property towards the required minimum EPC “E” target.
The new BRE research shows that £3,500 is sufficient to bring only 30-40% of excessively cold private rented homes to an “E” standard.
As individuals and families grapple with the cost of living crisis, these prices will be out of reach for many, and owner occupier households and private landlords may need targeted government support to be able to rectify hazards in their properties.
To this end, BRE continues to call for a strategic retrofit programme that will improve the quality of England’s housing stock and provide the financial incentives needed to drive standards up. That needs to target the very least energy efficient homes directly, and provide wider support for the UK’s transition to warm, well-insulated homes.
Investment now could deliver relatively rapid savings for the NHS, freeing up health funding for desperately needed spending in other areas.
Gillian Charlesworth added: “It’s clear from our research that there are major benefits to be reaped from improving the efficiency of England’s homes, particularly as households grapple with record energy prices and public services face significant pressure. However, while progress is being made in this area with new funding being allocated to home insulation, we still have a long way to go.
“Strategic retrofit programmes are critical to improving the energy efficiency and safety of a property. We need to see a continued and targeted effort to improve England’s poorest homes, for the benefit of individuals, society and our public infrastructure.”
BRE will be publishing a 30-year cost benefit analysis on the cost of all poor housing to the NHS and wider society later this year.
